A Terrible Pun

March 9th, 2006

From a case we read in Contracts today, Brookside Farms v. Mama Rizzo’s, Inc., 873 F.Supp. 1029. The case involved Brookside Farms selling basil leaves to Mama Rizzo’s under a contract that prohibited oral modifications, to which oral modifications were made, recorded, and performed on by both parties before the litigation ensued. From pages 1034-35 of the opinion (emphasis and hyperlink added):

For the Court to allow Defendant to invoke the no-oral-modification clause after MRI itself induced and participated in the extended course of action it now complains of would be to convert the sale of basil leaves into a “basil sale carcinoma” that would devour all reasonable commercial standards of behavior between merchants.

Further commentary would be superfluous.

Send this article to: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • Spurl

Entry Filed under: Law

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

March 2006
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Recent Posts

Featured Advertiser


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.